Discourse DB Analysis
The following information was obtained by making queries on the
RDF data produced by
Discourse DB (you can see the RDF data
here),
and performing further computation on the results. The entire operation
was performed using Perl. The action is done by two Perl scripts: the first
gets the necessary raw data from the RDF file through
SPARQL queries, using the
RDF::Query
library, and saves it into several text files; the second reads in the contents
of those text files, does the necessary computation and and analysis on the
data, and generates the HTML file you're reading now (including this text).
You can see copies of these two scripts
here and here,
respectively. The decision was made to have Perl do the heavy
lifting, instead of getting these values directly through complex SPARQL
queries, because SPARQL, as flexible as it is, is also much slower and more
resource-intensive than a regular Perl script. However's SPARQL's role in
retrieving the data is invaluable: although this page exists on the
discoursedb.org domain, the queries
and analysis could have been run from anywhere in the world.
A short introduction to the Discourse DB naming system: a topic
is a political issue, such as a bill, law or military conflict. A
position is a possible course of action relating to a topic. A
stance is a view on a position: either "for", "against" or "mixed".
An opinion is any one combination of a position and a stance.
Finally, an item is an editorial, column or post published in a
reputable newspaper, magazine or blog.
All information is specific to Discourse DB. Data was last updated on
July 3, 2009.
- Yaron Koren
Most-written-about topics:
Most-written-about positions:
Most popular opinions:
Most controversial positions:
Least controversial positions:
Most-frequently-appearing individual authors:
Most-frequently-appearing editorial boards:
Most-aligned authors: The two authors who agree on the most opinions are Los Angeles Times editorial board and The Washington Post editorial board, with 20 opinions in common, on the following positions:
Most-aligned individual authors: The two individual authors who agree on the most opinions are Robert Kagan and William Kristol, with 5 opinions in common, on the following positions:
Most-at-odds authors: The two authors who disagree on the most opinions are The New York Times editorial board and The Wall Street Journal editorial board, with 21 divergent opinions, on the following positions:
- Colombia-United States Free Trade Agreement / Agreement should be ratified (for & mixed, for)
- Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006 / Bolton should be confirmed (against, for)
- Confirmation of John Bolton as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, 2006 / Bolton should have been confirmed (against, for)
- Connecticut United States Senate election, 2006 / Lamont should be elected (for, against)
- Connecticut United States Senate election, 2006 / Lieberman should be elected (against, for)
- Darfur conflict / United Nations should send peacekeepers (for, against)
- Gonzales v. Carhart / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling (against, for)
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling (for, against)
- Iranian nuclear crisis / United States should negotiate with Iran (for, against)
- Military Commissions Act of 2006 / Act should be passed (against, for)
- Military Commissions Act of 2006 / Compromise bill should be passed (against, for)
- NSA warrantless surveillance controversy / Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional (for, against)
- North Korean nuclear crisis / United States should negotiate with North Korea (for, against)
- Parents v. Seattle / Supreme Court was correct in its ruling (against, for)
- Post-invasion Iraq / Coalition troops should pull out (for & mixed, against)
- Post-invasion Iraq / Iraq Study Group's recommendations should be followed (for, mixed)
- Post-invasion Iraq / United States should negotiate with Iran (for, against)
- Protect America Act of 2007 / Act should be renewed (against, for)
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act / Act should be reformed (against, for)
- State Children's Health Insurance Program / Program should be expanded (for, against)
- Trial of Saddam Hussein / Trial was fair (against, for)
Most-at-odds individual authors: The two individual authors who disagree on the most opinions are Charles Krauthammer and Wesley Clark, with 5 divergent opinions, on the following positions:
|