A better-than-expected nuclear deal with Iran: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=David Ignatius, |source=The Washington Post |date=April 2, 2015 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-deal-to-make-a-deal/2015/04/02/494cf99e-d980-11e4-...") |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote=Perhaps the most important part of the framework involves inspection and verification plans. Here, too, the United States seems to have obtained most of what it wanted. The IAEA could permanently monitor all of Iran’s nuclear facilities, using an intrusive measure known as the “additional protocol.” Inspection of Iran’s mines, mills and other elements of its nuclear supply chain would continue for 25 years. It’s a tougher package, in terms of preventing Iranian breakout, than many critics feared. | |quote=Perhaps the most important part of the framework involves inspection and verification plans. Here, too, the United States seems to have obtained most of what it wanted. The IAEA could permanently monitor all of Iran’s nuclear facilities, using an intrusive measure known as the “additional protocol.” Inspection of Iran’s mines, mills and other elements of its nuclear supply chain would continue for 25 years. It’s a tougher package, in terms of preventing Iranian breakout, than many critics feared. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion|Joint Comprehensive Plan of | {{Opinion|Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action|Plan is beneficial|for}} |
Latest revision as of 22:24, July 17, 2015
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | David Ignatius |
---|---|
Source | The Washington Post |
Date | April 2, 2015 |
URL | http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/a-deal-to-make-a-deal/2015/04/02/494cf99e-d980-11e4-8103-fa84725dbf9d_story.html |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Plan is beneficial on the topic Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.