Court deals a blow to free speech: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Item |author=Las Vegas Sun editorial board, |source=Las Vegas Sun |date=April 6, 2014 |url=http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2014/apr/06/court-deals-blow-free-speech/ |quote=...")
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 17:17, April 6, 2014

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Las Vegas Sun editorial board
Source Las Vegas Sun
Date April 6, 2014
URL http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2014/apr/06/court-deals-blow-free-speech/
Quote
Quotes-start.png Money is not speech, no matter what any court rules. Money can buy speech, such as advertisements, and can amplify speech, but it is a stretch of the imagination to say money is speech. By equating money to speech, the court saying that the rich have a greater right to speech than other people by elevating their right to exercise it one check at a time. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court voted correctly on the topic McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission.


This item refers to the previous opinion item Victory for free speech.