Free Speech Wins Big In Supreme Court Campaign Ruling: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Item |author=Investor's Business Daily editorial board, |source=Investor's Business Daily |date=April 2, 2104 |url=http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/040214-695713-su...")
 
(Resaving to hopefully fix query)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Item
{{Item
|author=Investor's Business Daily editorial board,  
|author=Investor's Business Daily editorial board,
|source=Investor's Business Daily
|source=Investor's Business Daily
|date=April 2, 2104
|date=April 2, 2104

Revision as of 17:19, April 6, 2014

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Investor's Business Daily editorial board
Source Investor's Business Daily
Date April 2, 2104
URL http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/040214-695713-supreme-court-rules-for-first-amendment-on-campaign-finance.htm
Quote
Quotes-start.png Right now, the interests that take most advantage of campaign finance restrictions are powerful unions with a vested interest in big government, like AFSCME and the NEA public school teachers' union, and trial lawyers seeking settlements from businesses. And they strongly favor liberal Democrats. Now that the public will be able to see more money going directly to candidates, we can expect the debate to focus more on ideas. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Supreme Court voted correctly on the topic McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission.