Give Iran deal hard look, serious debate: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Newsday editorial board, |source=Newsday |date=July 14, 2015 |url=http://www.newsday.com/opinion/editorial/iran-nuclear-deal-needs-hard-look-serious-debate-1.10...") |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|quote=Obama recognizes, like George W. Bush did before him, that Tehran has the right to build nuclear power plants to produce electricity. There also were deep concerns about whether the sanctions that brought Iran to the negotiating table -- specifically, the commitments from Russia and China -- would have stayed in place without a deal. All negotiations are gambles, but continuing the present course is a losing bet. It's time to move forward. | |quote=Obama recognizes, like George W. Bush did before him, that Tehran has the right to build nuclear power plants to produce electricity. There also were deep concerns about whether the sanctions that brought Iran to the negotiating table -- specifically, the commitments from Russia and China -- would have stayed in place without a deal. All negotiations are gambles, but continuing the present course is a losing bet. It's time to move forward. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Opinion|Joint Comprehensive Plan of | {{Opinion|Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action|Plan is beneficial|mixed}} |
Latest revision as of 22:19, July 17, 2015
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Newsday editorial board |
---|---|
Source | Newsday |
Date | July 14, 2015 |
URL | http://www.newsday.com/opinion/editorial/iran-nuclear-deal-needs-hard-look-serious-debate-1.10641821 |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item takes a mixed stance on the position Plan is beneficial on the topic Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.