Iran deal a gamble, but no deal would be worse: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Item |author=The Arizona Republic editorial board, |source=The Arizona Republic |date=July 14, 2015 |url=http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/editorial/2015/07/14/iran-nuc...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 01:05, July 17, 2015

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Arizona Republic editorial board
Source The Arizona Republic
Date July 14, 2015
URL http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/editorial/2015/07/14/iran-nuclear-deal-obama/30164395/
Quote
Quotes-start.png The history of nuclear proliferation among nations that did not come to the bargaining table is not impressive. Would the world be a safer place if nations had recognized first India's and then Pakistan's determination to be nuclear powers? Or if they had understood better the nuclear obsession of North Korea's regime? Perhaps diplomacy would have changed nothing. But failing to negotiate ensured the ultimate result. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Plan is beneficial on the topic Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.