Obama should sign Keystone Pipeline bill: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Item |author=Sun-Suntinel editorial board, |source=Sun-Sentinel |date=January 29, 2015 |url=http://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/editorials/fl-editorial-pipeline-0127-2015012...")
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 22:23, February 27, 2015

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Sun-Suntinel editorial board
Source Sun-Sentinel
Date January 29, 2015
URL http://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/editorials/fl-editorial-pipeline-0127-20150129-story.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png While Keystone foes have warned of spills from the 1,200-mile pipeline, there are more than 150,000 miles of pipeline crisscrossing this nation. A new one should be safer than the old ones. And the alternative of transporting oil by rail is more risky and less efficient. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Pipeline should be built on the topic Keystone XL pipeline.