The Keystone catechism: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Item |author=George F. Will, |source=The Washington Post |date=January 14, 2015 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/george-will-democratic-inanities-about-the-keysto...")
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 02:42, February 26, 2015

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) George F. Will
Source The Washington Post
Date January 14, 2015
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/george-will-democratic-inanities-about-the-keystone-pipeline/2015/01/14/271d8fe4-9b4d-11e4-bcfb-059ec7a93ddc_story.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png [Chris] Coons cannot believe that, absent Keystone, Canada will leave vast wealth — the world’s third-largest proven crude oil reserve, larger than Iran’s — untapped. The Canadian oil is going into the international market, and much of it into internal combustion engines around the world, even if this displeases Democratic senators who have demonstrated a willingness to look ludicrous rather than deviate from an especially silly component of today’s environmental catechism. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Pipeline should be built on the topic Keystone XL pipeline.