The President's Press Conference: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(Fixed URL)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{item
{{Item
|author=Diane Watson
|author=Diane Watson
|source=The Huffington Post
|source=The Huffington Post
|date=October 11, 2006
|date=October 11, 2006
|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-scheer/dear-leader-brings-it-on_b_31455.html
|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-diane-watson/the-presidents-press-conf_b_31532.html
|quote="Direct talks with North Korea should not be construed as a sign of weakness. The North Korean nuclear test warrants a serious administration review of whether bilateral discussions - in tandem with the Six-Party Talks - could deescalate the current impasse."
|quote="Direct talks with North Korea should not be construed as a sign of weakness. The North Korean nuclear test warrants a serious administration review of whether bilateral discussions - in tandem with the Six-Party Talks - could deescalate the current impasse."
}}
}}
 
{{Opinion|North Korean nuclear crisis|United States should negotiate with North Korea|for}}
{{opinion|North Korean nuclear crisis|United States should negotiate with North Korea|for}}

Latest revision as of 16:54, June 29, 2014

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Diane Watson
Source The Huffington Post
Date October 11, 2006
URL http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rep-diane-watson/the-presidents-press-conf_b_31532.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Direct talks with North Korea should not be construed as a sign of weakness. The North Korean nuclear test warrants a serious administration review of whether bilateral discussions - in tandem with the Six-Party Talks - could deescalate the current impasse." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should negotiate with North Korea on the topic North Korean nuclear crisis.