Thought money could buy an American election? You ain't seen nothin' yet: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Item |author=Gary Younge |source=The Guardian |date=April 6, 2014 |url=http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/06/money-bought-elections-us-donation-rules |quote=I...")
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 01:53, April 9, 2014

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Gary Younge
Source The Guardian
Date April 6, 2014
URL http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/06/money-bought-elections-us-donation-rules
Quote
Quotes-start.png In a system where money is considered speech, and corporations are people, this trend is inevitable. Elections become not a system of participatory engagement determining how the country is run, but the best democratic charade that money can buy. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court voted correctly on the topic McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission.