Tie Keystone approval to bigger environmental goals: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Item |author=The Boston Globe editorial board, |source=The Boston Globe |date=November 18, 2014 |url=http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2014/11/18/obama-should-ti...")
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 15:58, February 26, 2015

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Boston Globe editorial board
Source The Boston Globe
Date November 18, 2014
URL http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/editorials/2014/11/18/obama-should-tie-keystone-pipeline-approval-bigger-environmental-goals/87Nha5jDzdP4OULPU21a8N/story.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png So a veto now shouldn’t mean that Obama ought to reject Keystone categorically — just that approval ought to be predicated on bigger concessions by Congress on another part of the president’s environmental agenda. The goal should be to reduce emissions and boost energy efficiency, rather than block pipelines per se. Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item takes a mixed stance on the position Pipeline should be built on the topic Keystone XL pipeline.