A Sane Decision
From Discourse DB
This is an opinion item.
| Author(s) | Walter M. Weber |
|---|---|
| Source | National Review |
| Date | April 20, 2007 |
| URL | http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MjYzZGVkMTExZDFhY2JiNTMyMDJmNzFmMjJlMjRmZDQ= |
| Quote | "For far too long abortionists have been treated as exempt from the rules that apply to other physicians. Not only do they literally “get away with murder,” they also frequently get away with malpractice. Courts, meanwhile, have tended to bow to whatever “Doctor” says: if the doctor supports or practices abortion, that doctor’s testimony about what is or is not a valid safety concern has been treated as virtually infallible."
|
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Gonzales v. Carhart.
