Sarbanes-Oxley Act

From Discourse DB

Jump to: navigation, search
For more information, see the Wikipedia article "Sarbanes-Oxley Act"

This is a topic, with start date July 30, 2002 and end date unknownwarning.pngThe date “unknown” was not understood (support for dates is still experimental). .

Its theme(s) are United States domestic politics.

Positions are shown reverse-chronologically, by their earliest opinion item.

Summary of positions for this topic


Full listing

Click on position names to view quotes from each listed item.

Act should be repealed

For
Wall Street Woes by Nicole Gelinas (New York Post, 2007-01-23) (view)
Against
Plugging the IPO Drain by Reynolds Holding (Time, 2007-02-08) (view)

Act should be reformed

For
Frank and helpful by The Washington Times editorial board (The Washington Times, 2007-03-18) (view)
Against
Where Are the IPOs? by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, 2007-03-28) (view)


All items that address this topic (19 total)

Title Was written by Was published by Was published on
Where Are the IPOs? The Washington Post editorial board The Washington Post 1175054400March 28, 2007
Frank and helpful The Washington Times editorial board The Washington Times 1174190400March 18, 2007
Plugging the IPO Drain Reynolds Holding Time 1170910800February 8, 2007
Wall Street Woes Nicole Gelinas New York Post 1169528400January 23, 2007
Sarbanes-Oxley Is a Must Rachel Beck The Washington Post 1168578000January 12, 2007
Enron's Last Victim: American Markets William A. Niskanen The New York Times 1167800400January 3, 2007
A Verdict on Sarbanes-Oxley: Unconstitutional Kenneth Starr The Wall Street Journal 1166245200December 16, 2006
Cost of cutting red tape not worth the price St. Louis Post-Dispatch editorial board St. Louis Post-Dispatch 1165381200December 6, 2006
No time to weaken corporate oversight John R. Kroger The Oregonian 1164690000November 28, 2006
Democrats loosening their SOX? The Washington Times editorial board The Washington Times 1164603600November 27, 2006
The worm in the Big Apple Mortimer Zuckerman New York Daily News 1164603600November 27, 2006
Economic Poison Mark Heesen New York Post 1159848000October 3, 2006
Cox and Sarbox Mallory Factor National Review 1158638400September 19, 2006
Two Cheers for Nancy Pelosi Mallory Factor The Wall Street Journal 1142744400March 19, 2006
You Can Be Too Careful Brian Doherty Reason 1136091600January 1, 2006
Chris Cox: What the SEC Needs Larry Kudlow National Review 1117771200June 3, 2005
A Tremendously Costly Law John Berlau National Review 1113192000April 11, 2005
Beyond the 'Bad Apples' The Washington Post editorial board The Washington Post 1089345600July 9, 2004
In Defense of Sarbanes-Oxley Paul Volcker The Wall Street Journal 1087185600June 14, 2004


Please use a JavaScript-enabled browser to view this element. Browse the result list directly.DAYMONTHA Tremendously Costly Law2005-04-11T00:00:000Was written by John Berlau
Was published by National Review
Was published on April 11, 2005
A Verdict on Sarbanes-Oxley: Unconstitutional2006-12-16T00:00:000Was written by Kenneth Starr
Was published by The Wall Street Journal
Was published on December 16, 2006
Beyond the 'Bad Apples'2004-07-09T00:00:000Was written by The Washington Post editorial board
Was published by The Washington Post
Was published on July 9, 2004
Chris Cox: What the SEC Needs2005-06-03T00:00:000Was written by Larry Kudlow
Was published by National Review
Was published on June 3, 2005
Cost of cutting red tape not worth the price2006-12-06T00:00:000Was written by St. Louis Post-Dispatch editorial board
Was published by St. Louis Post-Dispatch
Was published on December 6, 2006
Cox and Sarbox2006-09-19T00:00:000Was written by Mallory Factor
Was published by National Review
Was published on September 19, 2006
Democrats loosening their SOX?2006-11-27T00:00:000Was written by The Washington Times editorial board
Was published by The Washington Times
Was published on November 27, 2006
Economic Poison2006-10-03T00:00:000Was written by Mark Heesen
Was published by New York Post
Was published on October 3, 2006
Enron's Last Victim: American Markets2007-01-03T00:00:000Was written by William A. Niskanen
Was published by The New York Times
Was published on January 3, 2007
Frank and helpful2007-03-18T00:00:000Was written by The Washington Times editorial board
Was published by The Washington Times
Was published on March 18, 2007
In Defense of Sarbanes-Oxley2004-06-14T00:00:000Was written by Paul Volcker
Was published by The Wall Street Journal
Was published on June 14, 2004
No time to weaken corporate oversight2006-11-28T00:00:000Was written by John R. Kroger
Was published by The Oregonian
Was published on November 28, 2006
Plugging the IPO Drain2007-02-08T00:00:000Was written by Reynolds Holding
Was published by Time
Was published on February 8, 2007
Sarbanes-Oxley Is a Must2007-01-12T00:00:000Was written by Rachel Beck
Was published by The Washington Post
Was published on January 12, 2007
The worm in the Big Apple2006-11-27T00:00:000Was written by Mortimer Zuckerman
Was published by New York Daily News
Was published on November 27, 2006
Two Cheers for Nancy Pelosi2006-03-19T00:00:000Was written by Mallory Factor
Was published by The Wall Street Journal
Was published on March 19, 2006
Wall Street Woes2007-01-23T00:00:000Was written by Nicole Gelinas
Was published by New York Post
Was published on January 23, 2007
Where Are the IPOs?2007-03-28T00:00:000Was written by The Washington Post editorial board
Was published by The Washington Post
Was published on March 28, 2007
You Can Be Too Careful2006-01-01T00:00:000Was written by Brian Doherty
Was published by Reason
Was published on January 1, 2006
2007-03-28T00:00:00
Retrieved from "http://discoursedb.org/wiki/Sarbanes-Oxley_Act"
Personal tools