What kind of rogue-state dialogue?
From Discourse DB
This is an opinion item.
| Author(s) | The Washington Times editorial board |
|---|---|
| Source | The Washington Times |
| Date | November 22, 2006 |
| URL | http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-iran21nov21,0,3834399.story |
| Quote | "While talks with Tehran and Damascus are unlikely to achieve very much, we have no objection in principle to the idea of talking to these governments. After all, to paraphrase Henry Kissinger, it makes little sense to talk only with people that we agree with. The real question is whether expanding dialogue with either of these governments is likely to yield peace or freedom in Iraq"
|
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item takes a mixed stance on the position United States should negotiate with Iran on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.
This item takes a mixed stance on the position United States should negotiate with Syria on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.
