Page values for "Back to the future on energy"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
_creationDateDatetimeJune 18, 2010 1:16:12 PM
_modificationDateDatetimeJune 18, 2010 1:16:12 PM
_creatorStringYaron Koren
_fullTextSearchtext{{Item |author=Scot Lehigh |source=The Boston Globe |date=June 18, 2010 |url=http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2010/06/18/back_to_the_future_on_energy/ |quote="Still, the price of carbon-based fuels will have to be higher and stay higher for the nation’s energy ...
_categoriesList of String, delimiter: |Items
_numRevisionsInteger1
_isRedirectBooleanNo
_pageNameOrRedirectStringBack to the future on energy
_pageIDOrRedirectInteger6,495
_lastEditorStringYaron Koren
_pageIDInteger6,495
_pageNamePageBack to the future on energy
_pageTitleString

Back to the future on energy

_pageNamespaceInteger0

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeValue
AuthorList of Page, delimiter: ,Scot Lehigh
SourcePageThe Boston Globe
DateDateJune 18, 2010
URLURLhttp://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2010/06/18/back_to_the_future_on_energy/
QuoteText"Still, the price of carbon-based fuels will have to be higher and stay higher for the nation’s energy mix to undergo a fundamental shift. The best way to accomplish that is by putting a price on the carbon and other greenhouse emissions, externalities long freely disposed of in the environment. And the most efficient way of doing that is through a cap-and-trade system, which would tap market forces to reduce those emissions."
SummaryWikitext

Back to the future on energy by Scot Lehigh (The Boston Globe, June 18, 2010) (view)

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
FieldField typeAllowed valuesValue
TopicPageAmerican Clean Energy and Security Act
Position_fragmentStringAct should be passed
PositionPageAmerican Clean Energy and Security Act / Act should be passed
Position_linkWikitext

Act should be passed

StanceStringfor · mixed · againstfor