Page values for "Government Medicine vs. the Elderly"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| _creationDate | Datetime | September 16, 2009 3:01:25 PM |
| _modificationDate | Datetime | March 11, 2010 2:33:22 PM |
| _creator | String | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | Searchtext | {{Item |author=Rupert Darwall |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=September 15, 2009 |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203917304574412680569936844.html |quote="The case for ObamaCare, as with the NHS, rests on what might be termed the "lump of health care" fallacy. ... |
| _categories | List of String, delimiter: | | Items |
| _numRevisions | Integer | 2 |
| _isRedirect | Boolean | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | String | Government Medicine vs. the Elderly |
| _pageIDOrRedirect | Integer | 5,637 |
| _lastEditor | String | Yaron Koren |
| _pageID | Integer | 5,637 |
| _pageName | Page | Government Medicine vs. the Elderly |
| _pageTitle | String | Government Medicine vs. the Elderly |
| _pageNamespace | Integer | 0 |
"Opinions" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Allowed values | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Page | Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act | |
| Position_fragment | String | Act should be passed | |
| Position | Page | Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Act should be passed | |
| Position_link | Wikitext | ||
| Stance | String | for · mixed · against | against |
"Items" values
1 row is stored for this page| Field | Field type | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Author | List of Page, delimiter: , | Rupert Darwall |
| Source | Page | The Wall Street Journal |
| Date | Date | September 15, 2009 |
| URL | URL | http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203917304574412680569936844.html |
| Quote | Text | "The case for ObamaCare, as with the NHS, rests on what might be termed the "lump of health care" fallacy. But in a market-based system triggering one person's contractual rights to health care does not invalidate someone else's health policy. Instead, increased demand for health care incentivizes new drugs, new therapies and better ways of delivering health care. Government-administered systems are so slow and clumsy that they turn the lump of health-care fallacy into a reality." |
| Summary | Wikitext | Government Medicine vs. the Elderly by Rupert Darwall (The Wall Street Journal, September 15, 2009) (view) |