Attack Iran, Ignore the Constitution

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 08:22, April 23, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Removing underscore)


Revision as of 16:20, February 3, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Multiple values for author)

(diff) ← Older revision | Approved revision (diff) | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Jeremy Brecher
Source The Nation
Date April 21, 2006
URL http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060508/attack_iran
Quote
"But the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war, as laid out in the 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States and reiterated in 2006, claims for the President the power to attack other countries--like Iran--simply because he asserts they pose a threat. It thereby removes the decision of war and peace from Congress and gives it the President. It is, as Senator Robert Byrd put it, 'unconstitutional on its face.'"


Add or change this opinion item's references



Author(s) [[{{{author}}}]]
Author(s) 2 (a field set by the form) {{{author 2}}}
URL
Quote (a textarea string)
Start date
Circulation (an integer)
Publication type (a multiple-value enumeration)
First name
Email address (an email)
Is nice (a boolean)


This item argues against the position United States should attack Iran on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.