The Supreme Court and the health-care mandate muddle

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 16:45, March 13, 2011 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=George F. Will, |source=The Washington Post |date=March 13, 2011 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/11/AR2011031105815.html |quote=...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) George F. Will
Source The Washington Post
Date March 13, 2011
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/03/11/AR2011031105815.html
Quote
Judge Kessler disdains the distinction between activity and inactivity as "of little significance." Her Orwellian theory is that government can regulate the activity - the mental activity - of choosing not to participate in a commercial activity.


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act should not have been passed on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Retrieved from "https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=The_Supreme_Court_and_the_health-care_mandate_muddle&oldid=14140"