'Victory' in Libya

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 08:28, September 1, 2011 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Better position)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Steve Chapman
Source Chicago Tribune
Date August 25, 2011
URL http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/ct-oped-0825-chapman-20110825,0,7558412.column
Quote
By some measures, Obama's war was less excusable. In going after Saddam, Bush at least could claim to be defusing an ongoing threat to our allies, in a vital region. But Gadhafi had stopped his sponsorship of terrorism, abandoned his nuclear quest and generally tried to become a respectable world citizen. That raises a point Obama may not want to stress. If you're a merciless despot, pondering the fate of your colleagues, there is only one conclusion to draw: Get nukes, and get them now.


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should not have intervened on the topic 2011 Libyan uprising.