An ObamaCare Board Answerable to No One

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 15:56, June 20, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=David Rivkin, Elizabeth Foley |source=The Wall Street Journal |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324634304578539823614996636.html |quote=Attempt...")

(diff) ← Older revision | Approved revision (diff) | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Revision as of 10:11, January 30, 2014 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Approved revision (diff) | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) David Rivkin, Elizabeth Foley
Source The Wall Street Journal
Date
URL http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324634304578539823614996636.html
Quote
Attempts to rein in government spending are laudable, but basic decisions about how and where to cut spending properly belong to Congress. In the 225 years of constitutional history, there has been no government entity that violated the separation-of-powers principle like the Independent Payment Advisory Board does.


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act is unconstitutional on the topic Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.