One Big Ugly Bill

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 17:15, October 14, 2025 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Times Union editorial board |source=Times Union |date=June 29, 2025 |url=https://www.timesunion.com/opinion/article/editorial-one-big-ugly-bill-20395561.php |quote=We’re no hard-liners when it comes to deficits and debt, but even a government that spends more than it takes in needs to be prudent. At more than $36.2 trillion, the national debt is now 120% of the U.S. gross domestic product. This bill would likely send it past 130% by 2034, heading toward...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Times Union editorial board
Source Times Union
Date June 29, 2025
URL https://www.timesunion.com/opinion/article/editorial-one-big-ugly-bill-20395561.php
Quote
We’re no hard-liners when it comes to deficits and debt, but even a government that spends more than it takes in needs to be prudent. At more than $36.2 trillion, the national debt is now 120% of the U.S. gross domestic product. This bill would likely send it past 130% by 2034, heading toward 150% by mid-century.


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Retrieved from "https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=One_Big_Ugly_Bill&oldid=37922"