The Supreme Court Goes to War

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 13:04, June 17, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=John Yoo |source=The Wall Street Journal |date=June 17, 2008 |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121366596327979497.html |quote="Judicial micromanagement will now intrude i...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) John Yoo
Source The Wall Street Journal
Date June 17, 2008
URL http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121366596327979497.html
Quote
"Judicial micromanagement will now intrude into the conduct of war. Federal courts will jury-rig a process whose every rule second-guesses our soldiers and intelligence agents in the field. A judge's view on how much "proof" is needed to find that a "suspect" is a terrorist will become the standard applied on the battlefield. Soldiers will have to gather "evidence," which will have to be safeguarded until a court hearing, take statements from "witnesses," and probably provide some kind of Miranda-style warning upon capture. No doubt lawyers will swarm to provide representation for new prisoners."


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Boumediene v. Bush.