The Jihad Five

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 12:25, June 24, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=Investor's Business Daily editorial board |source=Investor's Business Daily |date=June 12, 2008 |url=http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=298162827194451 |quote=...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Investor's Business Daily editorial board
Source Investor's Business Daily
Date June 12, 2008
URL http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=298162827194451
Quote
"The decision "sets our military commanders the impossible task of proving to a civilian court, under whatever standards this Court devises in the future, that evidence supports the confinement of each and every enemy prisoner." [Scalia] concluded: "The Nation will live to regret what the Court has done today.""


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Boumediene v. Bush.

Retrieved from "https://discoursedb.org/w/index.php?title=The_Jihad_Five&oldid=7792"