This is an opinion item.
| Author(s)
|
Richard Epstein
|
| Source
|
The Wall Street Journal
|
| Date
|
December 19, 2008
|
| URL
|
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122964977342320545.html
|
| Quote
|
|
"The Supreme Court (unfortunately, in my view) has held that the peculiar labor-law environment justified these abridgements of ordinary speech rights. But it hardly follows that if the government can curtail speech rights, the EFCA can eliminate them. There is simply no legitimate government interest in promoting unionization that justifies a clandestine organizing campaign which denies all speech rights to the unions' adversaries."
|
|
|
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Act should be passed on the topic Employee Free Choice Act.
