The Battle of Gaza

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 10:20, January 22, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=Clifford May |source=National Review |date=January 22, 2009 |url=http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjEyMWM4MTA1YzcxMWFiZTIxZWE0M2M3YWYyMmI3YTM= |quote="But if Israel has ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Clifford May
Source National Review
Date January 22, 2009
URL http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NjEyMWM4MTA1YzcxMWFiZTIxZWE0M2M3YWYyMmI3YTM=
Quote
"But if Israel has succeeded in destroying most Hamas weapons caches and factories, as well as most of the tunnels through which Hamas imported thousands of missiles—even as it claimed Israel was blocking supplies of food, fuel, and medicines through its “siege”—Israel achieved important, if short-term military goals."


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Israel was right to attack Gaza on the topic 2008–2009 Israel–Gaza conflict.