Wanted: Personal Economic Trainers. Apply at Capitol.

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 12:28, February 6, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=Steven Pearlstein |source=The Washington Post |date=February 6, 2009 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/05/AR2009020503413.html |quote="Even i...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Steven Pearlstein
Source The Washington Post
Date February 6, 2009
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/05/AR2009020503413.html
Quote
"Even if the entire sum were to be stolen by federal employees and spent entirely on fast cars, fancy homes, gambling junkets and fancy clothes, it would still be an $800 billion increase in the demand for goods and services -- a pretty good working definition for economic stimulus. The only question is whether spending it on other things would create more long-term value, which it almost certainly would."


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Act should be passed on the topic American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.