'Back Off, Israel,' Doesn't Cut It: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (rv) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|source=Los Angeles Times | |source=Los Angeles Times | ||
|date=August 6, 2006 | |date=August 6, 2006 | ||
|url=http://www. | |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,1838688,00.html | ||
|quote="Israel is hoping to change the equation, to force Lebanon to take control of its border or accept an outside force that would do so. The tactic of striking Hezbollah has some chance of bringing that about. Stopping the attack and hoping for the best has no chance at all." | |quote="Israel is hoping to change the equation, to force Lebanon to take control of its border or accept an outside force that would do so. The tactic of striking Hezbollah has some chance of bringing that about. Stopping the attack and hoping for the best has no chance at all."}} | ||
}} | |||
{{opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Israel was right to attack Lebanon|mixed}} | |||
{{opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|United States should call for a cease-fire|against}} | {{opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|United States should call for a cease-fire|against}} |
Latest revision as of 16:30, May 2, 2007
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Jonathan Chait |
---|---|
Source | Los Angeles Times |
Date | August 6, 2006 |
URL | http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,1838688,00.html |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item takes a mixed stance on the position Israel was right to attack Lebanon on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.
This item argues against the position United States should call for a cease-fire on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.