‘Sucker’s deal’

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 14:50, November 26, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Charles Krauthammer, |source=The Washington Post |date=November 21, 2013 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-krauthammer-suckers-deal/2013/11/2...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Charles Krauthammer
Source The Washington Post
Date November 21, 2013
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-krauthammer-suckers-deal/2013/11/21/9d03e966-52dc-11e3-a7f0-b790929232e1_story.html
Quotes-start.png Don’t worry, we are assured. The sanctions relief is reversible. Nonsense. It was extraordinarily difficult to cobble together the current sanctions. It took endless years of overcoming Russian, Chinese and Indian recalcitrance, together with foot-dragging from Europeans making a pretty penny from Iran. Once the relaxation begins, how do you reverse it? Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues for the position United States should not have signed agreement on the topic Geneva interim agreement on Iranian nuclear program.