2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict / Israel was right to agree to a cease-fire: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) m (2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict / Israel should have agreed to a cease-fire moved to 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict / Israel was right to agree to a cease-fire: Test of moving) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 18:35, August 18, 2006
Position: Israel was right to agree to a cease-fire
This position addresses the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.
For this position
"The resolution adopted on a 15-to-0 vote, if implemented faithfully by all sides, would significantly reduce Hezbollah's ability to cause trouble." |
From A Month of War, by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, August 13, 2006) (view)
Against this position
"But now the ceasefire is a catastrophe for Israel to harvest, and Lebanon to share. And it was Israel's fault. Not for trying to destroy Hezbollah, but for failing to do so." |
Mixed on this position
No results