5 wrong justices

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 17:09, September 18, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) John Yoo
Source USA Today
Date June 29, 2006
URL http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2006-06-29-oppose_x.htm
Quotes-start.png "What the justices did would have been unthinkable in prior military conflicts: Judicial intervention in the decisions of the president and Congress on how best to wage war. They replaced his wartime judgment and Congress' support with their own speculation that open trials would not run intelligence risks." Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Hamdan v. Rumsfeld.