Page values for "ACLU v. NSA: "A Fearless and Independent Judiciary""
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"_pageData" values
| _creationDate | August 20, 2006 3:36:09 AM |
| _modificationDate | August 20, 2006 3:36:09 AM |
| _creator | Yaron Koren |
| _fullText | {{item |author=Geoffrey R. Stone |source=The Huffington Post |date=8/19/2006 |url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey-r-stone/aclu-v-nsa-a-fearless-_b_27583.html |quote="I will venture a partial prediction: If the appellate judges do not hide behind the vacuous standing and state secrets arg ... |
| _categories | Items |
| _numRevisions | 1 |
| _isRedirect | No |
| _pageNameOrRedirect | ACLU v. NSA: "A Fearless and Independent Judiciary" |
"_fileData" values
"Items" values
| Author | Geoffrey R. Stone |
| Source | The Huffington Post |
| Date | August 19, 2006 |
| URL | http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey-r-stone/aclu-v-nsa-a-fearless-_b_27583.html |
| Quote | "I will venture a partial prediction: If the appellate judges do not hide behind the vacuous standing and state secrets arguments, they will uphold Judge Taylor's ruling. On the merits, the illegality of the NSA program is too clear to elide." |
| Summary | ACLU v. NSA: "A Fearless and Independent Judiciary" by Geoffrey R. Stone (The Huffington Post, 8/19/2006) (view) |
"Opinions" values
| Topic | NSA warrantless surveillance controversy |
| Position_fragment | Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional |
| Position | NSA warrantless surveillance controversy / Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional |
| Position_link | |
| Stance | for |
