Page values for "A 'Surge' in Iraq?"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

_creationDateJanuary 7, 2007 7:48:59 PM
_modificationDateJanuary 7, 2007 7:48:59 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{item |author=The Washington Post editorial board |source=The Washington Post |date=January 7, 2007 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/06/AR2007010601013.html |quote="The logic of the surge assumes that while U.S. soldiers ensured security, Iraq's Sunni, Shiite a ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions1
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectA 'Surge' in Iraq?

"_fileData" values

"Items" values

AuthorThe Washington Post editorial board
SourceThe Washington Post
DateJanuary 7, 2007
URLhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/06/AR2007010601013.html
Quote"The logic of the surge assumes that while U.S. soldiers ensured security, Iraq's Sunni, Shiite and Kurdish factions could be pressured into political accord. Yet given their recent behavior, it's hard to believe that the political leadership of any of Iraq's main factions is ready for compromise -- or will be during the limited window created by the surge."
Summary

A 'Surge' in Iraq? by The Washington Post editorial board (The Washington Post, January 7, 2007) (view)

"Opinions" values

TopicPost-invasion Iraq
Position_fragmentUnited States should increase troop levels
PositionPost-invasion Iraq / United States should increase troop levels
Position_link

United States should increase troop levels

Stancemixed