A Case for Appeal

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 14:48, September 26, 2006 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Post editorial board
Source The Washington Post
Date September 26, 2006
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/25/AR2006092501300.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "The compromise bill strips the courts of any jurisdiction to hear cases -- including those cases already pending -- concerning detainee treatment. Unless this provision is changed, the administration will be free to ignore Mr. McCain's interpretation." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Compromise bill should be passed on the topic Military Commissions Act of 2006.