A Greener Look for Coal

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 18:04, July 9, 2009 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Item |author=The Washington Post editorial board |source=The Washington Post |date=June 25, 2009 |url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/24/AR20090624')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) The Washington Post editorial board
Source The Washington Post
Date June 25, 2009
URL http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/24/AR2009062403266.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Uncertainties abound: What if the costs of clean coal don't come down enough to make it economical relative to other measures? If clean coal turns out to be less than its advocates envision, can Congress ever work up the political will to kill the subsidy program? Subsidies are set to phase out after 10 years of paying for operating costs, but won't powerful coal-state lawmakers fight to keep them going?" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item takes a mixed stance on the position Act should be passed on the topic American Clean Energy and Security Act.