A Law Unto Herself: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Fixed URL) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|source=The New York Times | |source=The New York Times | ||
|date=8/23/2006 | |date=8/23/2006 | ||
|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/23/opinion/23althouse.html | |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/23/opinion/23althouse.html | ||
|quote="For those who approve of the outcome , the judge’s opinion is counterproductive. It will be harder to defend upon appeal than a more careful decision. It suggests that there are no good legal arguments against the program, just petulance and outrage and antipathy toward President Bush." | |quote="For those who approve of the outcome , the judge’s opinion is counterproductive. It will be harder to defend upon appeal than a more careful decision. It suggests that there are no good legal arguments against the program, just petulance and outrage and antipathy toward President Bush." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{opinion|NSA warrantless surveillance controversy|Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional|against}} | {{opinion|NSA warrantless surveillance controversy|Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional|against}} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:52, November 9, 2006
This is an opinion item.
| Author(s) | Ann Althouse | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | The New York Times | |||
| Date | 8/23/2006 | |||
| URL | http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/23/opinion/23althouse.html | |||
| Quote |
|
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues against the position Judge Taylor was right to rule program unconstitutional on the topic NSA warrantless surveillance controversy.