Page values for "A Strong Health Reform Bill"

Jump to navigation Jump to search

"_pageData" values

1 row is stored for this page
_creationDateJuly 19, 2009 9:54:43 PM
_modificationDateMarch 11, 2010 2:30:22 PM
_creatorYaron Koren
_fullText{{Item |author=The New York Times editorial board |source=The New York Times |date=July 15, 2009 |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/opinion/16thu1.html |quote="This bill is clearly not hugely costly. It would expand the government’s role in financing and regulating coverage but would also ...
_categoriesItems
_numRevisions2
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectA Strong Health Reform Bill

"Items" values

1 row is stored for this page
AuthorThe New York Times editorial board
SourceThe New York Times
DateJuly 15, 2009
URLhttp://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/16/opinion/16thu1.html
Quote"This bill is clearly not hugely costly. It would expand the government’s role in financing and regulating coverage but would also bolster private coverage. It would increase employer-based coverage, mostly by requiring employers to participate. And it would send more clients to the private insurance industry. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that perhaps 10 million people might enroll in a new public plan, while twice that number might enroll in competing private policies."
Summary

A Strong Health Reform Bill by The New York Times editorial board (The New York Times, July 15, 2009) (view)

"Opinions" values

1 row is stored for this page
TopicPatient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Position_fragmentAct should be passed
PositionPatient Protection and Affordable Care Act / Act should be passed
Position_link

Act should be passed

Stancefor