Jump to content

A deal to regret

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 14:27, November 27, 2013 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Boston Herald editorial board, |source=Boston Herald |date=November 26, 2013 |url=http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/opinion/editorials/2013/11/editorial_a_d...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Boston Herald editorial board
Source Boston Herald
Date November 26, 2013
URL http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/opinion/editorials/2013/11/editorial_a_deal_to_regret
Quote
The dreadful fact of life is that any deal that is causing jubilation in the streets of Tehran, but trepidation in the streets of Jerusalem and Riyadh cannot be a good thing. The Saudis have been remarkably quiet thus far, but they know well that allowing Iran to continue any uranium enrichment — and this agreement does that — undercuts previous United Nations efforts to halt enrichment entirely.


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position United States should not have signed agreement on the topic Geneva interim agreement on Iranian nuclear program.