A flawed strategy in Iraq: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(Global replace - 'http://washingtontimes.com' to 'http://www3.washingtontimes.com')
 
Line 3: Line 3:
|source=The Washington Times
|source=The Washington Times
|date=March 23, 2007
|date=March 23, 2007
|url=http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20070322-084333-9793r.htm
|url=http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20070322-084333-9793r.htm
|quote="This is the strategic logic of American benevolence. As in: "We're so strategically nice it's only logical that everyone like us." Is it really? Are the same criteria for reasonableness common to every culture? PC aside, of course not."
|quote="This is the strategic logic of American benevolence. As in: "We're so strategically nice it's only logical that everyone like us." Is it really? Are the same criteria for reasonableness common to every culture? PC aside, of course not."
}}
}}


{{opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|United States should increase troop levels|against}}
{{opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|United States should increase troop levels|against}}

Latest revision as of 16:27, July 16, 2007

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Diana West
Source The Washington Times
Date March 23, 2007
URL http://www3.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20070322-084333-9793r.htm
Quote
Quotes-start.png "This is the strategic logic of American benevolence. As in: "We're so strategically nice it's only logical that everyone like us." Is it really? Are the same criteria for reasonableness common to every culture? PC aside, of course not." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position United States should increase troop levels on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.