A good Peru trade pact

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 19:54, September 18, 2007 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{item |author=Barbara Bowie-Whitman |source=The Washington Times |date=September 17, 2007 |url=http://washingtontimes.com/article/20070917/COMMENTARY/109170021/1012/COMMENTARY |quote="The...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Barbara Bowie-Whitman
Source The Washington Times
Date September 17, 2007
URL http://washingtontimes.com/article/20070917/COMMENTARY/109170021/1012/COMMENTARY
Quote
Quotes-start.png "The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) estimates the agreement would result in a larger increase in U.S. exports to Peru ($1.1 billion a year) than in Peru's exports to the United States ($439 million). According to the American Farm Bureau Federation, U.S. farm exports could increase by $705 million a year. U.S. GDP may rise by $2.1 billion or more annually under the agreement, according to the ITC." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Agreement should be ratified on the topic Peru-United States Free Trade Agreement.