A setback to equality: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: {{item |author=San Francisco Chronicle editorial board |source=San Francisco Chronicle |date=June 29, 2007 |url=http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/06/29/EDGNNQ4TAQ1.DTL |...)
 
(Global replace - 'Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District' to 'Parents v. Seattle')
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}


{{opinion|Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District|Supreme Court was correct in its ruling|against}}
{{opinion|Parents v. Seattle|Supreme Court was correct in its ruling|against}}

Revision as of 22:34, July 11, 2007

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) San Francisco Chronicle editorial board
Source San Francisco Chronicle
Date June 29, 2007
URL http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/06/29/EDGNNQ4TAQ1.DTL
Quote
Quotes-start.png "The U.S. Supreme Court's twisted logic in limiting a school district's ability to take race into account as a way to end racial segregation echoes the court's Plessy vs. Ferguson ruling of 1896. That ruling put the imprimatur on "separate but equal" policies that allowed racial discrimination and oppression to flourish for more than half-a-century more." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic Parents v. Seattle.