A shameful deal on Iran nukes

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 22:23, July 17, 2015 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Boston Herald editorial board
Source Boston Herald
Date July 15, 2015
URL http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/opinion/editorials/2015/07/editorial_a_shameful_deal_on_iran_nukes
Quotes-start.png Yes there are repeated references to inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency — who have, of course, in the past been stonewalled at efforts to inspect facilities in Iran — being “requested to monitor and verify the voluntary nuclear-related measures as detailed” in the agreement. “Voluntary” — really? But should inspectors have actual concerns about a possible breach of the deal they would be required to engage in a kind of “Mother, may I” pleading to the Iranians, such as this as outlined in Section 76: “IAEA will provide Iran the reasons for access in writing and will make available relevant information” [about a possible breach]. Quotes-end.png

Add or change this opinion item's references

This item argues against the position Plan is beneficial on the topic Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.