Advocates of 'proportion' are just unbalanced: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(Changed dead URL)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
|source=Chicago Sun-Times
|source=Chicago Sun-Times
|date=August 6, 2006
|date=August 6, 2006
|url=http://www.suntimes.com/output/steyn/cst-edt-steyn06.html
|url=http://jewishworldreview.com/0806/steyn080706.php3
|quote="Twenty-eight dead civilians in a village from which 150 Katyusha rockets have been launched against Israel doesn't seem "disproportionate" to me. What's "disproportionate" is the idea that civilian life should be allowed to proceed normally in what is, in fact, a terrorist launching platform."
|quote="Twenty-eight dead civilians in a village from which 150 Katyusha rockets have been launched against Israel doesn't seem "disproportionate" to me. What's "disproportionate" is the idea that civilian life should be allowed to proceed normally in what is, in fact, a terrorist launching platform."
}}
}}


{{opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Israel was right to attack Lebanon|for}}
{{opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Israel was right to attack Lebanon|for}}

Latest revision as of 20:12, September 21, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Mark Steyn
Source Chicago Sun-Times
Date August 6, 2006
URL http://jewishworldreview.com/0806/steyn080706.php3
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Twenty-eight dead civilians in a village from which 150 Katyusha rockets have been launched against Israel doesn't seem "disproportionate" to me. What's "disproportionate" is the idea that civilian life should be allowed to proceed normally in what is, in fact, a terrorist launching platform." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Israel was right to attack Lebanon on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.