Affirming the Rule of Law

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 16:21, June 27, 2008 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Item |author=New York Post editorial board |source=New York Post |date=June 27, 2008 |url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/06272008/postopinion/editorials/affirming_the_rule_of_law_117490.htm...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) New York Post editorial board
Source New York Post
Date June 27, 2008
URL http://www.nypost.com/seven/06272008/postopinion/editorials/affirming_the_rule_of_law_117490.htm
Quote
Quotes-start.png "It's a welcome decision - if only in its faithfulness to the uniquely American role of a written Constitution in protecting individual liberties." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position Supreme Court was correct in its ruling on the topic District of Columbia v. Heller.