After the Bombs, Politics: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}


{{opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Israel should have agreed to a cease-fire|for}}
{{opinion|2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict|Israel was right to a cease-fire|for}}

Revision as of 18:36, August 18, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) David Ignatius
Source Washington Post
Date August 16, 2006
URL http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/08/the_solutions_to_the_middle_ea.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is getting bashed at home for failing to deliver a quick victory over Hezbollah. But he deserves credit for recognizing the need for a political settlement that enhanced the authority of the Lebanese state. He wisely resisted pressure from his generals to mount a major ground offensive north of the Litani River, understanding that this quest for a decisive military solution would only take Israel deeper into the Lebanese quagmire." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues for the position 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict / Israel was right to a cease-fire on the topic 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict.