(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- For more information, see the Wikipedia article "Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination"
This is a topic, with start date September 26, 2020 and end date October 26, 2020.
Its theme(s) are United States domestic politics.
Summary of positions for this topic
Full listing
Click on position names to view quotes from each listed item.
| Summary |
Position link |
Stance |
|---|
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett will be a boon to the nation by New York Post editorial board (New York Post, October 26, 2020) (view) |
Barrett should be confirmed |
for |
| Amy Coney Barrett and the confirmation process by Pittsburgh Post-Gazette editorial board (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, October 19, 2020) (view) |
Barrett should be confirmed |
for |
| Amy Coney Barrett truly shines under fire in Senate hearings by New York Post editorial board (New York Post, October 13, 2020) (view) |
Barrett should be confirmed |
for |
| An evasive high court nominee inches toward Senate confirmation by San Francisco Chronicle editorial board (San Francisco Chronicle, October 23, 2020) (view) |
Barrett should be confirmed |
against |
| Court's legitimacy in the balance by Newsday editorial board (Newsday, October 17, 2020) (view) |
Barrett should be confirmed |
against |
| Judge Barrett showed she was learned in the law; that’s not enough by Los Angeles Times editorial board (Los Angeles Times, October 16, 2020) (view) |
Barrett should be confirmed |
against |
| Delay the Senate vote on Supreme Court nomination of Amy Coney Barrett by Houston Chronicle editorial board (Houston Chronicle, October 16, 2020) (view) |
Barrett should be confirmed |
against |
All items that address this topic (7 total)