(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- For more information, see the Wikipedia article "Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court nomination"
This is a topic, with start date September 26, 2020 and end date October 26, 2020.
Its theme(s) are United States domestic politics.
Summary of positions for this topic[edit]
Full listing[edit]
Click on position names to view quotes from each listed item.
| Summary |
Position link |
Stance |
|---|
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett will be a boon to the nation by New York Post editorial board (New York Post, October 26, 2020) (view) |
Barrett should be confirmed |
for |
| Amy Coney Barrett and the confirmation process by Pittsburgh Post-Gazette editorial board (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, October 19, 2020) (view) |
Barrett should be confirmed |
for |
| Amy Coney Barrett truly shines under fire in Senate hearings by New York Post editorial board (New York Post, October 13, 2020) (view) |
Barrett should be confirmed |
for |
| An evasive high court nominee inches toward Senate confirmation by San Francisco Chronicle editorial board (San Francisco Chronicle, October 23, 2020) (view) |
Barrett should be confirmed |
against |
| Court's legitimacy in the balance by Newsday editorial board (Newsday, October 17, 2020) (view) |
Barrett should be confirmed |
against |
| Judge Barrett showed she was learned in the law; that’s not enough by Los Angeles Times editorial board (Los Angeles Times, October 16, 2020) (view) |
Barrett should be confirmed |
against |
| Delay the Senate vote on Supreme Court nomination of Amy Coney Barrett by Houston Chronicle editorial board (Houston Chronicle, October 16, 2020) (view) |
Barrett should be confirmed |
against |
All items that address this topic (7 total)[edit]
