Another way to interpret this report is 'Stay but don't screw up': Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) m (Baker-Hamilton's fine print: Stay in Iraq moved to Another way to interpret this report is 'Stay but don't screw up': Earlier version) |
Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{item | {{item | ||
|author=Niall Ferguson | |author=Niall Ferguson | ||
|source= | |source=The Daily Telegraph | ||
|date=December | |date=December 10, 2006 | ||
|url=http://www. | |url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/12/10/do1002.xml | ||
|quote="Hats off, then, to Baker and his team. This turns out to be a classic work of persuasion. Its target audiences have been well chosen. Its worst-case scenario is plausible. And its recommendations are so carefully phrased that they sound like disengagement while actually signifying better engagement." | |quote="Hats off, then, to Baker and his team. This turns out to be a classic work of persuasion. Its target audiences have been well chosen. Its worst-case scenario is plausible. And its recommendations are so carefully phrased that they sound like disengagement while actually signifying better engagement." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|Iraq Study Group's recommendations should be followed|for}} | {{opinion|Post-invasion Iraq|Iraq Study Group's recommendations should be followed|for}} |
Latest revision as of 16:21, December 11, 2006
This is an opinion item.
Author(s) | Niall Ferguson |
---|---|
Source | The Daily Telegraph |
Date | December 10, 2006 |
URL | http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2006/12/10/do1002.xml |
Quote |
Add or change this opinion item's references
This item argues for the position Iraq Study Group's recommendations should be followed on the topic Post-invasion Iraq.