Difference between revisions of "Attack Iran, Ignore the Constitution"

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Removing categories)
(Saving for testing)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{item
{{item
|title=Attack Iran, Ignore the Constitution
|author=Jeremy Brecher
|author=Jeremy Brecher
|author2=Brendan Smith
|source=The Nation
|source=The Nation
|url=http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060508/attack_iran
|url=http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060508/attack_iran
|date=4/21/2006
|date=April 21, 2006
|quote= "But the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war, as laid out in the 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States and reiterated in 2006, claims for the President the power to attack other countries--like Iran--simply because he asserts they pose a threat. It thereby removes the decision of war and peace from Congress and gives it the President. It is, as Senator Robert Byrd put it, 'unconstitutional on its face.'"
|quote="But the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war, as laid out in the 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States and reiterated in 2006, claims for the President the power to attack other countries--like Iran--simply because he asserts they pose a threat. It thereby removes the decision of war and peace from Congress and gives it the President. It is, as Senator Robert Byrd put it, 'unconstitutional on its face.'"}}
}}
 
{{additional_author|Brendan Smith}}


{{opinion|Iranian nuclear crisis|United States should attack Iran|against}}
{{opinion|Iranian nuclear crisis|United States should attack Iran|against}}

Revision as of 12:11, April 23, 2007

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Jeremy Brecher
Source The Nation
Date April 21, 2006
URL http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060508/attack_iran
Quote
Quotes-start.png "But the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war, as laid out in the 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States and reiterated in 2006, claims for the President the power to attack other countries--like Iran--simply because he asserts they pose a threat. It thereby removes the decision of war and peace from Congress and gives it the President. It is, as Senator Robert Byrd put it, 'unconstitutional on its face.'" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references



Author(s) [[{{{author}}}]]
Author(s) 2 (a field set by the form) {{{author 2}}}
URL
Quote (a textarea string)
Start date
Circulation (an integer)
Publication type (a multiple-value enumeration)
First name
Email address (an email)
Is nice (a boolean)


This item argues against the position United States should attack Iran on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.