Attack Iran, Ignore the Constitution: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
}}
}}


{{opinion|Iranian Nuclear Crisis|US Should Attack Iran|against}}
{{opinion|Iranian nuclear crisis|United States should attack Iran|against}}
[Category:US Middle East Foreign Policy]
 
[Category:Limits of Presidential Powers]
[[Category:US Middle East Foreign Policy]]
[[Category:Limits of Presidential Powers]]

Revision as of 15:55, August 11, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s)
Source The Nation
Date 4/21/2006
URL http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060508/attack_iran
Quote
Quotes-start.png "But the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war, as laid out in the 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States and reiterated in 2006, claims for the President the power to attack other countries--like Iran--simply because he asserts they pose a threat. It thereby removes the decision of war and peace from Congress and gives it the President. It is, as Senator Robert Byrd put it, 'unconstitutional on its face.'" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position United States should attack Iran on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.