Attack Iran, Ignore the Constitution: Difference between revisions

From Discourse DB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Fixed author fields)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{item
{{item
|title=Attack Iran, Ignore the Constitution
|title=Attack Iran, Ignore the Constitution
|author1=Jeremy Brecher
|author=Jeremy Brecher
|Brendan Smith
|author2=Brendan Smith
|source=The Nation
|source=The Nation
|url=http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060508/attack_iran
|url=http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060508/attack_iran

Revision as of 04:16, August 15, 2006

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Jeremy Brecher
Source The Nation
Date 4/21/2006
URL http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060508/attack_iran
Quote
Quotes-start.png "But the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive war, as laid out in the 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States and reiterated in 2006, claims for the President the power to attack other countries--like Iran--simply because he asserts they pose a threat. It thereby removes the decision of war and peace from Congress and gives it the President. It is, as Senator Robert Byrd put it, 'unconstitutional on its face.'" Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position United States should attack Iran on the topic Iranian nuclear crisis.