Behavioral profiling best way to enhance air travel security

From Discourse DB
Revision as of 03:58, November 29, 2010 by Yaron Koren (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Item |author=Jonathan Gurwitz |source=San Antonio Express-News |date=November 27, 2010 |url=http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/columnists/jonathan_gurwitz/behavioral_profiling...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is an opinion item.

Author(s) Jonathan Gurwitz
Source San Antonio Express-News
Date November 27, 2010
URL http://www.mysanantonio.com/opinion/columnists/jonathan_gurwitz/behavioral_profiling_best_way_to_enhance_air_travel_security_110467859.html
Quote
Quotes-start.png "As a strategy, it's absurd, allowing al-Qaida to fashion new kinds of bombs for a few hundred dollars that will provoke spasms of security responses costing airlines and taxpayers billions of dollars. For the government, it seemingly presents a no-win situation. Respond, and stand accused of wasting money on intrusive measures. Do nothing, and bear the blame when the next terrorist attack succeeds. There's a better way. Instead of only looking for weapons and bombs, our security screening process should also be looking for the people who are likely to carry them." Quotes-end.png


Add or change this opinion item's references


This item argues against the position New procedures are justified on the topic TSA airport screening procedures controversy.


This item argues for the position Profiling should be used instead on the topic TSA airport screening procedures controversy.